Filed: Sep. 09, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11493 Summary Calendar CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Dallas County Sheriff; RANDY FARRIS, Dr, Health Department Director; STEVEN BOWERS, Jail Medical Director; DALLAS COUNTY OF, Defendants-Appellees. ***** CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas, Defendant-Appellee. ***** CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas, RANDY FARRIS, Dr,
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11493 Summary Calendar CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Dallas County Sheriff; RANDY FARRIS, Dr, Health Department Director; STEVEN BOWERS, Jail Medical Director; DALLAS COUNTY OF, Defendants-Appellees. ***** CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas, Defendant-Appellee. ***** CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas, RANDY FARRIS, Dr, S..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-11493
Summary Calendar
CHARLES MASON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JIM BOWLES, Dallas County Sheriff; RANDY FARRIS, Dr, Health
Department Director; STEVEN BOWERS, Jail Medical Director; DALLAS
COUNTY OF,
Defendants-Appellees.
*****
CHARLES MASON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas,
Defendant-Appellee.
*****
CHARLES MASON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas,
RANDY FARRIS, Dr, STEVEN BOWERS,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
October 27, 1997
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Mason appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defendants. Mason contends that
defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical
needs. We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and
AFFIRM the magistrate judge’s grant of summary judgment for
essentially the same reasons articulated by the magistrate judge
in Mason v. Bowles, No. 3-95-CV-0136-BD (N.D. Tex. filed Nov. 4,
1996).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2