Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mason v. Bowles, 96-11493 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-11493 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 09, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11493 Summary Calendar CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Dallas County Sheriff; RANDY FARRIS, Dr, Health Department Director; STEVEN BOWERS, Jail Medical Director; DALLAS COUNTY OF, Defendants-Appellees. ***** CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas, Defendant-Appellee. ***** CHARLES MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas, RANDY FARRIS, Dr,
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 96-11493
                           Summary Calendar


CHARLES MASON,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellant,

     v.

JIM BOWLES, Dallas County Sheriff; RANDY FARRIS, Dr, Health
Department Director; STEVEN BOWERS, Jail Medical Director; DALLAS
COUNTY OF,

                                           Defendants-Appellees.
                                 *****

CHARLES MASON,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellant,

     v.

JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas,

                                           Defendant-Appellee.

                                 *****
CHARLES MASON,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellant,

     v.

JIM BOWLES, Sheriff, Dallas County Texas,
RANDY FARRIS, Dr, STEVEN BOWERS,

                                           Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
                          October 27, 1997
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Charles Mason appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defendants.   Mason contends that

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical

needs.   We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and

AFFIRM the magistrate judge’s grant of summary judgment for

essentially the same reasons articulated by the magistrate judge

in Mason v. Bowles, No. 3-95-CV-0136-BD (N.D. Tex. filed Nov. 4,

1996).

     AFFIRMED.




     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.


                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer