Barney v. Armstrong, 02-30693 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 02-30693
Filed: Mar. 10, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30693 _ HEATHER KRISTENE BARNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUSAN L. ARMSTRONG; CITY OF BOSSIER; ABC INSURANCE CO.; XYZ INSURANCE CO., Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CV-164 _ Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30693 _ HEATHER KRISTENE BARNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUSAN L. ARMSTRONG; CITY OF BOSSIER; ABC INSURANCE CO.; XYZ INSURANCE CO., Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CV-164 _ Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-30693 _____________________ HEATHER KRISTENE BARNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUSAN L. ARMSTRONG; CITY OF BOSSIER; ABC INSURANCE CO.; XYZ INSURANCE CO., Defendants - Appellees. __________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CV-164 _________________________________________________________________ Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons set out in the good opinion of the district court. AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
