Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51205 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RONALD JAY CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CR-48-ALL - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ronald Jay Clifton pleaded guilty to counts
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51205 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RONALD JAY CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-02-CR-48-ALL - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ronald Jay Clifton pleaded guilty to counts o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-51205
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONALD JAY CLIFTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-02-CR-48-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ronald Jay Clifton pleaded guilty to counts one and two of
an information charging him with conspiracy to commit fraud and
securities fraud. Clifton has appealed, raising issues related
to the district court’s upward departure from the guideline
imprisonment range. In his plea agreement, Clifton waived the
right to raise these issues on appeal and the record reflects
that the waiver was knowing and voluntary. See United States v.
Melancon,
972 F.2d 566, 567–68 (5th Cir. 1992). We caution
counsel that the assertion of issues on appeal that are plainly
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-51205
-2-
barred by a plea agreement and the failure to explain in briefing
why the defendant’s issues are not waived invites the imposition
of a sanction. See United States v. Martinez,
263 F.3d 436, 438
(5th Cir. 2001). The appeal is
DISMISSED.