Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10854 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAMELA O’GUINN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-39-ALL - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10854 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAMELA O’GUINN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-39-ALL - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represen..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-10854
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PAMELA O’GUINN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:03-CR-39-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pamela
O’Guinn on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
O’Guinn has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this
direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.