Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10913 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO FLORES-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-140-A-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate coun
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-10913 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO FLORES-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-140-A-ALL - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed appellate couns..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-10913
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICARDO FLORES-VARGAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:03-CR-140-A-ALL
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed appellate counsel for defendant Ricardo
Flores-Vargas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Flores-Vargas’s one-
page response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Appointed counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.