Landry v. Spclt Diving LA Inc, 03-31028 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 03-31028
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 28, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 28, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _ No. 03-31028 _ RICHARD LANDRY, Individually and as partner in the community of acquets and gains existing between them; TRUDY LANDRY, Individually and as partner in the community of acquets and gains existing between them Plaintiffs - Appellants v. SPECIALTY DIVING OF LOUISIANA INC; ET AL Defendants SPECIALTY DIVING OF LOUISIANA INC
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 28, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _ No. 03-31028 _ RICHARD LANDRY, Individually and as partner in the community of acquets and gains existing between them; TRUDY LANDRY, Individually and as partner in the community of acquets and gains existing between them Plaintiffs - Appellants v. SPECIALTY DIVING OF LOUISIANA INC; ET AL Defendants SPECIALTY DIVING OF LOUISIANA INC ..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 28, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk ____________________ No. 03-31028 ____________________ RICHARD LANDRY, Individually and as partner in the community of acquets and gains existing between them; TRUDY LANDRY, Individually and as partner in the community of acquets and gains existing between them Plaintiffs - Appellants v. SPECIALTY DIVING OF LOUISIANA INC; ET AL Defendants SPECIALTY DIVING OF LOUISIANA INC Defendant - Appellee _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (02-CV-1746-K) _________________________________________________________________ Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm the district court’s judgment for essentially the reasons given in the Order & Reasons filed on September 26, 2003. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
