Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40592 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT PRESTON HAYES, also known as Bobby Preston, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1440-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40592 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT PRESTON HAYES, also known as Bobby Preston, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1440-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-40592
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT PRESTON HAYES, also known as Bobby Preston,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-02-CR-1440-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender (FPD), appointed to represent
appellant Robert Preston Hayes, has moved for leave to withdraw
and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hayes has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the FPD is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.