Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Torres-Juarez, 03-40949 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-40949 Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-40949 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARTIN TORRES-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-03-CR-390-ALL - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Martin Tor
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 21, 2004

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                              No. 03-40949                          Clerk
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN TORRES-JUAREZ,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. L-03-CR-390-ALL
                      --------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Martin Torres-Juarez has

filed a motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).        Torres-

Juarez has not filed a response.     Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this

direct appeal.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer