Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza, 03-41107 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41107 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41107 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR RAMIREZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-150-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defe
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 18, 2004

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                             No. 03-41107
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR RAMIREZ-MENDOZA,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 1:02-CR-150-1
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar

Ramirez-Mendoza (Ramirez) has moved for leave to withdraw from

this direct appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Ramirez has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.       Our

independent review of the brief and the record disclose no

nonfrivolous issue in this appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-41107
                               -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer