Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Nixon, 03-41119 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41119 Visitors: 38
Filed: Feb. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41119 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GREGORY FLOYD NIXON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-80-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defende
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   February 18, 2004

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                              No. 03-41119
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

GREGORY FLOYD NIXON,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Texas
                         USDC No. 1:02-CR-80-1
                          --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gregory

Floyd Nixon has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Nixon has not filed a response.        Our independent review of the

brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.        Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer