Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41153 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN MACIAS-OLIVO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-450-1 - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repre
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41153 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN MACIAS-OLIVO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-450-1 - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repres..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41153
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN MACIAS-OLIVO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-03-CR-450-1
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan
Macias-Olivo has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Macias has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.