Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Macias-Olivo, 03-41153 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41153 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 20, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41153 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN MACIAS-OLIVO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-450-1 - Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repre
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                      April 21, 2004

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                             No. 03-41153
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MACIAS-OLIVO,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. B-03-CR-450-1
                      --------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan

Macias-Olivo has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant

to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 744 (1967).       Macias has

not filed a response.    Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer