Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Patino-De La Torre, 03-41446 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-41446 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41446 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL PATINO-DE LA TORRE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-1602-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Manuel Patino-De La Torre (“P
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit

                                                             FILED
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS        August 18, 2004
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                       Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                               Clerk

                            No. 03-41446
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL PATINO-DE LA TORRE,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. L-02-CR-1602-1
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Manuel Patino-De La Torre (“Patino”) appeals his guilty plea

conviction and 70-month sentence for illegal reentry into the

United States following an aggravated felony conviction in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.   For the first time on appeal,

Patino argues that the sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1) & (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-41446
                               -2-

     Patino acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
(1998), but he

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review.   Apprendi

did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 
Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90
; United States v. Mancia-Perez, 
331 F.3d 464
, 470 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 
124 S. Ct. 358
(2003).

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer