Filed: Jun. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41486 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGELO SILVA-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-87-2 - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Angelo Silva
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41486 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGELO SILVA-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-87-2 - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Angelo Silva-..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 18, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41486
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGELO SILVA-GUTIERREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-03-CR-87-2
--------------------
Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Angelo Silva-Gutierrez (Silva-
Gutierrez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Silva-Gutierrez was notified of counsel’s motion and did not file
a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-41486
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.