Filed: Jun. 22, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 22, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41552 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CONRADO PULIDO, also known as Junior, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-02-CR-36-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Conrado Pulido pleaded gui
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 22, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41552 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CONRADO PULIDO, also known as Junior, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-02-CR-36-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Conrado Pulido pleaded guil..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 22, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41552
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CONRADO PULIDO,
also known as Junior,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. V-02-CR-36-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Conrado Pulido pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting in the
distribution of less than 500 grams of cocaine. He appeals the
120-month term of imprisonment imposed, arguing that the district
court clearly erred in adjusting his offense level for his
leadership role in the offense.
Pulido withdrew his objection to the adjustment for his
leadership role in the offense at the sentencing hearing.
Pulido has thus waived any challenge to the adjustment made based
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-41552
-2-
on his role in the offense, and his argument is not reviewable on
appeal. See United States v. Musquiz,
45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir.
1995); United States v. Olano,
507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993).
AFFIRMED.