Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Martinez-Cantu, 03-50177 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-50177 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 04, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50177 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DORA ALICIA MARTINEZ-CANTU, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-486-2-FB - Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender a
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS         February 4, 2004
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk

                           No. 03-50177
                         Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DORA ALICIA MARTINEZ-CANTU,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                    USDC No. DR-02-CR-486-2-FB
                       --------------------

Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dora

Alicia Martinez-Cantu (“Martinez”) has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Martinez has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief, but she has not filed a response.

Based on our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the

record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 03-50177
                                -2-

appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer