Filed: Dec. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50621 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE SANCHEZ-CARRASCO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-02-CR-00250-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Relying on Blakel
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50621 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE SANCHEZ-CARRASCO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-02-CR-00250-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Relying on Blakely..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-50621
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JORGE SANCHEZ-CARRASCO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-02-CR-00250-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Relying on Blakely v. Washington,
124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004),
Jorge Sanchez-Carrasco argues that the district court erred by
imposing a sentence based on facts that were neither admitted nor
found by a jury beyond reasonable doubt. The Government has
moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s
brief because the issue is foreclosed in this circuit under
United States v. Pineiro,
377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir. 2004), petition
for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). The issue is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-50621
-2-
indeed foreclosed. See
Pineiro, 377 F.3d at 473. Accordingly,
the Government’s motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.