Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Martin, 03-50888 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-50888 Visitors: 37
Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-50888 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL JOSEPH MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-03-CR-107-ALL-JN - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS         FILED
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT               August 18, 2004

                                                       Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                               Clerk
                             No. 03-50888
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JOSEPH MARTIN,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                    USDC No. A-03-CR-107-ALL-JN
                        --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Michael Joseph Martin has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Martin was informed

of counsel’s instant motion but did not file a response.         Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer