Filed: Jul. 07, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 7, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51080 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISMAEL NAVARRETTE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-03-CR-56-ALL - Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ismael Navarrette appeals from his sentence f
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 7, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51080 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISMAEL NAVARRETTE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-03-CR-56-ALL - Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ismael Navarrette appeals from his sentence fo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 7, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-51080
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISMAEL NAVARRETTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-03-CR-56-ALL
--------------------
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ismael Navarrette appeals from his sentence for abusive
sexual conduct in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(2).
Navarrette argues that he may challenge his sentence despite his
waiver of his right to appeal.
This court reviews de novo whether a waiver of appeal bars
an appeal. United States v. Baymon,
312 F.3d 725, 727 (5th Cir.
2002). Navarrette knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to
appeal his sentence. See United States v. Portillo,
18 F.3d 290,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-51080
-2-
292-93 (5th Cir. 1994). Navarrette’s waiver of appeal is
enforceable and bars the present appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.