Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Alejo-Zuniga, 03-51273 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-51273 Visitors: 47
Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51273 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE ALEJO-ZUNIGA, also known as Enrique Bautista Zuniga, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-03-CR-201-ALL-SS - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit

                                                              FILED
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS        June 23, 2004
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                        Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                Clerk

                            No. 03-51273
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ENRIQUE ALEJO-ZUNIGA,
also known as Enrique Bautista Zuniga,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                   USDC No. A-03-CR-201-ALL-SS
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Enrique Alejo-Zuniga has

filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 744 (1967).    Alejo-Zuniga has not filed

a response.    Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer