Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51273 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE ALEJO-ZUNIGA, also known as Enrique Bautista Zuniga, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-03-CR-201-ALL-SS - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51273 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE ALEJO-ZUNIGA, also known as Enrique Bautista Zuniga, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-03-CR-201-ALL-SS - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-51273
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ENRIQUE ALEJO-ZUNIGA,
also known as Enrique Bautista Zuniga,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-03-CR-201-ALL-SS
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Enrique Alejo-Zuniga has
filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Alejo-Zuniga has not filed
a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.