Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Aldape-Ortiz, 03-51437 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-51437 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 18, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-51437 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO ALDAPE-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-03-CR-276-4 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Rober
More
                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                FILED
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS          August 18, 2004
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk

                             No. 03-51437
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO ALDAPE-ORTIZ,
                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. P-03-CR-276-4
                        --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Roberto Aldape-Ortiz

(“Aldape”) has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Aldape has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief but has not filed a response.       Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer