Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Thibodaux, 04-30407 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-30407 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30407 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES W. THIBODAUX, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:03-CR-10013-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* James W. Thi
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 17, 2004

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-30407
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES W. THIBODAUX, JR.,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Western District of Louisiana
                    USDC No. 1:03-CR-10013-ALL
                       --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     James W. Thibodaux, Jr., appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea to making false statements to a bank and obstructing

an audit by making false entries in the records of a financial

institution.   Thibodaux argues that the district court improperly

enhanced his sentence based on facts not alleged in the bill of

information, not proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, nor

admitted by him in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 
124 S. Ct. 2531
(2004).   As Thibodaux concedes, this argument is foreclosed


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-30407
                               -2-

by United States v. Pineiro, 
377 F.3d 464
, 473 (5th Cir. 2004),

petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263).

Thibodaux states that he raises the issues to preserve them for

further review.

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer