Filed: Oct. 13, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 13, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50096 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD BURTON PIDCOKE, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-90-CR-110-1 - Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Rich
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 13, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50096 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICHARD BURTON PIDCOKE, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-90-CR-110-1 - Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Richa..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 13, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-50096
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICHARD BURTON PIDCOKE, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-90-CR-110-1
--------------------
Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Richard Burton Pidcoke, Jr.,
has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Pidcoke has filed a response in which he raises claims pursuant
to Blakely v. Washington,
124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004).
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Pidcoke’s
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-50096
-2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.