Filed: Dec. 17, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50557 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-307-1-SS - Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Jud
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50557 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-307-1-SS - Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judg..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-50557
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 1:03-CR-307-1-SS
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Cuesta-
Rodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States
v. Pineiro,
377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for
cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that
Blakely v. Washington,
124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not apply to
the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion
for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.