Filed: Mar. 09, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-60425 Summary Calendar _ CURTIS COULTER; KATHY COULTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus ST. FRANCIS ACADEMY, INCORPORATED, PICAYUNE, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:95:CV-320GR _ March 14, 1997 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Curtis and Kathy Coulter appeal from a summary judgment in favor of St. Fra
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-60425 Summary Calendar _ CURTIS COULTER; KATHY COULTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus ST. FRANCIS ACADEMY, INCORPORATED, PICAYUNE, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:95:CV-320GR _ March 14, 1997 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Curtis and Kathy Coulter appeal from a summary judgment in favor of St. Fran..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 96-60425
Summary Calendar
_____________________
CURTIS COULTER; KATHY COULTER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
ST. FRANCIS ACADEMY, INCORPORATED,
PICAYUNE, MISSISSIPPI,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:95:CV-320GR
_________________________________________________________________
March 14, 1997
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Curtis and Kathy Coulter appeal from a summary judgment in
favor of St. Francis Academy finding it exempt from provisions of
the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 et seq. The court
cannot look to legislative intent when the statute is rational and
unambiguous. See In re Hammers,
988 F.2d 32, 34 (5th Cir. 1993).
A F F I R M E D.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.