Filed: Mar. 04, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11070 Summary Calendar RONALD CRAIG HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS H. JEAN-LOUIS, Dr.; SHAFFER, Dr.; RONALD DREWRY, Warden, LOONEY, Major, Defendants-Appellees. _ No. 97-10344 Summary Calendar _ RONALD CRAIG HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS H. JEAN-LOUIS, DR., ET AL., Defendants, H. JEAN-LOUIS, DR.,; SHAFFER, DR., Defendants-Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas 1 (1:96-CV-59
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-11070 Summary Calendar RONALD CRAIG HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS H. JEAN-LOUIS, Dr.; SHAFFER, Dr.; RONALD DREWRY, Warden, LOONEY, Major, Defendants-Appellees. _ No. 97-10344 Summary Calendar _ RONALD CRAIG HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS H. JEAN-LOUIS, DR., ET AL., Defendants, H. JEAN-LOUIS, DR.,; SHAFFER, DR., Defendants-Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas 1 (1:96-CV-59-..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-11070
Summary Calendar
RONALD CRAIG HENRY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
H. JEAN-LOUIS, Dr.; SHAFFER, Dr.;
RONALD DREWRY, Warden, LOONEY, Major,
Defendants-Appellees.
__________________________________
No. 97-10344
Summary Calendar
___________________________________
RONALD CRAIG HENRY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
H. JEAN-LOUIS, DR., ET AL.,
Defendants,
H. JEAN-LOUIS, DR.,; SHAFFER, DR.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
1
(1:96-CV-59-BA & 1:96-CV-59-C)
July 2, 1997
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ronald Craig Henry, Texas state prisoner # 694744 requests
consolidation of appeals and permission to proceed in forma
pauperis (IFP) in the appeals arising out of the denial of his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit.
The district court dismissed a portion of the original suit
based on immunity of the defendants and Henry timely appealed.
Subsequently, the district court granted summary judgment on the
remaining claims and Henry appealed that ruling as well.
It is ORDERED that the motion of appellant to consolidate case
number 97-10344 with case number 96-11070 is GRANTED.
On January 14, 1997, this court held Henry’s appeal in
abeyance for 30 days pending payment of the $105 filing fee or
submittal of the required documents pursuant to the Prison
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). Henry timely responded;
however, the documentation submitted by Henry covered the wrong
six-month period (July 1996 through December 1996). The correct
six-month period is February 1996 through July 1996 because Henry’s
notice of appeal was filed on August 23, 1996. See § 1915(a)(b).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2
Therefore, Henry’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal
is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.3. Should Henry wish to reinstate his appeal,
he is instructed to pay the $105 filing fee to the clerk of the
district court or to submit the appropriate trust fund
documentation within 30 days from the date of this order.
MOTION FOR IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
3