Filed: Mar. 04, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-30199 Conference Calendar WADE P. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHNNY SCOTT, Captain, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-336-B - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wade P. Jackson, Louisiana prisoner No. 113076, has filed a motion for permission to file a supplemental brief and a “
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-30199 Conference Calendar WADE P. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHNNY SCOTT, Captain, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-336-B - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wade P. Jackson, Louisiana prisoner No. 113076, has filed a motion for permission to file a supplemental brief and a “M..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-30199
Conference Calendar
WADE P. JACKSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHNNY SCOTT, Captain,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 94-CV-336-B
--------------------
February 16, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Wade P. Jackson, Louisiana prisoner No. 113076, has filed a
motion for permission to file a supplemental brief and a “Motion
for Written Verification and Answers.” The motions are DENIED.
Jackson argues that the district court erred by entering
summary judgment in favor of the defendant without allowing
Jackson to complete discovery of his medical records. Jackson
has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion
by entering summary judgment without ordering further discovery.
Richardson v. Henry,
902 F.2d 414, 417 (5th Cir. 1990).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
For the first time on appeal, Jackson argues that the
defendant sprayed a “whole can” of mace into his cell and that he
has suffered permanent injuries as a result. These allegations
were not presented to the district court and they involve factual
matters that cannot be decided by this court for the first time
on appeal. Robertson v. Plano City of Texas,
70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th
Cir. 1995); United States v. Vital,
68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir.
1995).
AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.