Filed: Mar. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: No. 99-41439 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41439 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN INFANTE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-97-CR-235-4 - April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellate counsel appointed to represent Juan Infante has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
Summary: No. 99-41439 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41439 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN INFANTE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-97-CR-235-4 - April 14, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appellate counsel appointed to represent Juan Infante has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S...
More
No. 99-41439
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41439
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN INFANTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-97-CR-235-4
--------------------
April 14, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appellate counsel appointed to represent Juan Infante has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and Infante has filed a response in which he argues that
that there is no evidentiary basis for the district court’s
determination that he was responsible for over 3000 kilograms of
marijuana. The record shows that the district court did not
clearly err in its determination of the relevant quantity of
drugs. United States v. Edwards,
65 F.3d 430, 432 (5th Cir.
1995). Our independent review of the record and briefs has
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-41439
-2-
revealed no other nonfrivolous appellate issues. Accordingly,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
appeal is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED.