Filed: Mar. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41470 No. 98-41471 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SABINO GRANDE-FLORES, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-396-1 USDC No. B-98-CR-369-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defenders appointed to represent Sabino Grande-
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41470 No. 98-41471 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SABINO GRANDE-FLORES, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-396-1 USDC No. B-98-CR-369-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defenders appointed to represent Sabino Grande-F..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41470
No. 98-41471
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SABINO GRANDE-FLORES,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-396-1
USDC No. B-98-CR-369-1
--------------------
August 24, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Assistant Federal Public Defenders appointed to
represent Sabino Grande-Flores have filed a motion to withdraw
from representation of Grande and a brief as required by Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Grande has filed no response
to his attorneys’ motion and brief. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, Grande’s court-appointed attorneys’ motion to
withdraw is GRANTED; the attorneys are excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.