Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Vences, 03-21135 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 03-21135 Visitors: 50
Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-21135 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VALENTIN RODRIGUEZ VENCES, also known as Flaco, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-575-3 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed co
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   June 22, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 03-21135
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VALENTIN RODRIGUEZ VENCES,
also known as Flaco,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
               Appeal from the United States District
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 4:02-CR-575-3
                         --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Valentin Rodriguez Vences has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance

with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Our independent

review of the briefs, Rodriguez Vences’s response, and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

     Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.    Counsel’s

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 03-21135
                               -2-

request that Rodriguez Vences be permitted to proceed pro se on

appeal is DENIED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer