United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                            Fifth Circuit
                                                                                          F I L E D
                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                                            June 17, 2005
                                          FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                                      Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                                              Clerk
                                            ____________

                                            No. 03-40728
                                            ____________


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE EPIFANIO ELIZARRARAZ,

                                Defendant-Appellant.


                            Appeal from the United States District Court
                                for the Southern District of Texas
                                  USDC No. B-02-CR-781-ALL



         ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

         The Supreme Court has granted Defendant-Appellant Jose Epifanio Elizarraraz’s petition for

a writ of certiorari, vacated our previous affirmance of his conviction, and remanded the case to this

court for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 

(2005).

         Elizarraraz challenged the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines as applied to him for


         *
               Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
the first time in his petition for a writ of certiorari. Absent exceptional circumstances, we will not

consider an argument raised for the first time in a petition for certiorari. United States v. Taylor, No.

03-10167, 

, at *1 (5th Cir. May 17, 2005); see also United States v. Hernandez-

Gonzalez, 

, 261-62 (5th Cir. 2005) (holding that, absent extraordinary circumstances,

we will not consider an issue raised for the first time in a petition for rehearing); United States v.

Ardley, 

(11th Cir. 2001) (en banc) (holding that even a remand by the Supreme Court

for reconsideration in light of an intervening Court opinion does not require the court to consider an

argument raised for the first time in a petition for certiorari). While we have not defined what

constitutes “extraordinary circumstances” in cases involving Booker issues, we have held that an

appellant who cannot satisfy the plain error standard under United States v. Mares, 

(5th

Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (March 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517) cannot demonstrate extraordinary

circumstances. See Taylor, 

, at *1 (“Because plain error has not been shown, it

is obvious that the much more demanding standard for extraordinary circumstances . . . cannot be

satisfied.”).

        Elizarraraz has not shown plain error because he has offered no evidence suggesting that “the

sentencing judge))sentencing under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory one))would have

reached a significantly different result.” 

. Accordingly, he has also failed to

show extraordinary circumstances warranting consideration of an issue raised for the first time in a

petition for a writ of certiorari. See Taylor, 

, at *1.

        Having reconsidered our decision in accordance with the Supreme Court’s instructions, we

reinstate our judgment affirming Elizarraraz’s conviction and sentence.