Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-41052 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PORFIRIO GUAJARDO, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-402-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Pu
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 03-41052 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PORFIRIO GUAJARDO, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-402-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Pub..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 03-41052 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PORFIRIO GUAJARDO, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:01-CR-402-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender representing Porfirio Guajardo,
Jr., has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guajardo has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.