Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Edwards, 04-11367 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-11367 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jun. 22, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-11367 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERALD PAUL EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-40-ALL-H - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 22, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-11367
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JERALD PAUL EDWARDS,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 3:04-CR-40-ALL-H
                       --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jerald Paul

Edwards presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by

United States v. Daugherty, 
264 F.3d 513
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001),

which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-

possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and United

States v. Dancy, 
861 F.2d 77
, 81 (5th Cir. 1985), which held that

the Government need not prove that the defendant knew that the

firearm was in or affecting interstate commerce.   The

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-11367
                               -2-

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer