Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20003 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20003 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-20003
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Danny Medellin on appeal has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed both an original and
supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Medellin has filed a pro se response. Our
independent review of counsel’s briefs, Medellin’s pro se
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.