Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Medellin, 04-20003 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-20003 Visitors: 52
Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20003 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 22, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-20003
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANNY MEDELLIN, also known as DJ Storm,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:01-CR-830-6
                       --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Danny Medellin on appeal has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed both an original and

supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Medellin has filed a pro se response.      Our

independent review of counsel’s briefs, Medellin’s pro se

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer