Filed: Jun. 02, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20580 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE EVANS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-285-2 - Before GARZA, DEMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Eddie Bryant Evans appeals his sentence after pleading
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20580 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE EVANS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-285-2 - Before GARZA, DEMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Eddie Bryant Evans appeals his sentence after pleading ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 2, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-20580
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDDIE EVANS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:03-CR-285-2
--------------------
Before GARZA, DEMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Eddie Bryant Evans appeals his sentence after pleading
guilty to possession with intent to distribute 100 grams or more
of phencyclidine. In a plea agreement, Evans waived his appeal
rights, unless there were an upward departure from the sentencing
guidelines. The waiver was knowing and voluntary, and the
sentence was within the guidelines range. See United States v.
McKinney, __F.3d__, No. 04-41223,
2005 WL 887153, *2-*3 & n.5
(5th Cir. Apr. 15, 2005). His appeal is DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.