Williams v. Hertz Corp, 04-20704 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-20704
Visitors: 28
Filed: May 24, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20704 WILLIE WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HERTZ CORP., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:03-CV-1647) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20704 WILLIE WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HERTZ CORP., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:03-CV-1647) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. A..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 24, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20704 WILLIE WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HERTZ CORP., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:03-CV-1647) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
