United States v. Barrera-Saucedo, 04-20943 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-20943
Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 22, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 22, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20943 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. DANIEL BARRERA-SAUCEDO Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.* PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion to expedite the appeal is grant
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 22, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20943 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. DANIEL BARRERA-SAUCEDO Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.* PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion to expedite the appeal is grante..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 22, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-20943 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. DANIEL BARRERA-SAUCEDO Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston --------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.* PER CURIAM: IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion to expedite the appeal is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s motion to vacate and remand in light of USA v. Booker is granted. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
