Filed: Oct. 21, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30375 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SEALED JUVENILE 1, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-11-N-2 - Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Before the court is an interlocutory appeal
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30375 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SEALED JUVENILE 1, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-11-N-2 - Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Before the court is an interlocutory appeal o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 21, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-30375
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SEALED JUVENILE 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:04-CR-11-N-2
--------------------
Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Before the court is an interlocutory appeal of an order by
the district court transferring appellant, a juvenile male, for
prosecution as an adult under 18 U.S.C. § 5032. Appellant argues
that the district court abused its discretion in granting the
Government’s motion to transfer proceedings against the juvenile
to an adult criminal prosecution. We have reviewed the record
and briefs of counsel and find no abuse of discretion. United
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-30375
-2-
States v. Juvenile No. 1,
118 F.3d 298, 307 (5th Cir. 1997).
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s order of
transfer.
AFFIRMED.