Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Chiasson v. LA Machinery Co Inc, 04-30652 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-30652 Visitors: 29
Filed: May 16, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit May 16, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30652 In the Matter of: SEAREX ENERGY SERVICES, INC., SEAREX, INC., Debtors, C. MICHAEL CHIASSON, Appellant, VERSUS LOUISIANA MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., former known as Louisiana Machinery, Inc., Appellee, In the Matter of: SEAREX ENERGY SERVICES, INC., SEAREX, INC., Debtors, C. MICHAEL CHIASSON, Appellant, VERSUS SUPERIOR FABRICATORS, INC.,
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit May 16, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30652 In the Matter of: SEAREX ENERGY SERVICES, INC., SEAREX, INC., Debtors, C. MICHAEL CHIASSON, Appellant, VERSUS LOUISIANA MACHINERY COMPANY, INC., former known as Louisiana Machinery, Inc., Appellee, In the Matter of: SEAREX ENERGY SERVICES, INC., SEAREX, INC., Debtors, C. MICHAEL CHIASSON, Appellant, VERSUS SUPERIOR FABRICATORS, INC., Appellee, In The Matter of: SEAREX ENERGY SERVICES INC., SEAREX, INC., Debtors, C. MICHAEL CHIASSON, Trustee, Appellant, VERSUS SPECIALITY MARINE & SUPPLY, LLC, Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana 2:03:CV-1610 Before DAVIS, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the Judgment of the District Court for essentially the reasons stated in its Opinion dated March 24, 2003. The Bankruptcy Court correctly concluded that the summary judgment evidence established that the funds used to make payments to appellees were not within the control of the debtor and therefore were not owned by the debtor at the time of the transfer. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer