White v. Black & Decker (US), 04-30710 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-30710
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 11, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 11, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 04–30710 _ KENNETH B WHITE, Individually and as father and as next friend of Kenneth Lincoln White and Mandolyn White, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLACK & DECKER (US) INC, doing business as DeWalt Industrial Tool Company, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana (No
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 11, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 04–30710 _ KENNETH B WHITE, Individually and as father and as next friend of Kenneth Lincoln White and Mandolyn White, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLACK & DECKER (US) INC, doing business as DeWalt Industrial Tool Company, Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana (No...
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 11, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III __________________________ Clerk No. 04–30710 __________________________ KENNETH B WHITE, Individually and as father and as next friend of Kenneth Lincoln White and Mandolyn White, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BLACK & DECKER (US) INC, doing business as DeWalt Industrial Tool Company, Defendant - Appellee. ___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana (No. 2:03–CV–874–N) ___________________________________________________ Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s order, we AFFIRM. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
