Filed: May 11, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 11, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30778 Summary Calendar RONE DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CV-01726-PM-APW - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Cir
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 11, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-30778 Summary Calendar RONE DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CV-01726-PM-APW - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 11, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-30778
Summary Calendar
RONE DAVIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; BUREAU OF
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:03-CV-01726-PM-APW
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rone Davis appeals from the district court’s denial of his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his order of removal and
his post-removal-order detention. On appeal, Davis has withdrawn
his challenge to the order of removal. The remaining issues
Davis has raised on appeal have been rendered moot by his removal
to Haiti during the pendency of this appeal. See United States
Parole Comm’n v. Geraghty,
445 U.S. 388, 395-96 (1980).
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.