Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40351 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MACSIMIANO RIOS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-250-2 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Macsimiano Rios (“Rios”) appeals his guilty
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40351 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MACSIMIANO RIOS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-250-2 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Macsimiano Rios (“Rios”) appeals his guilty-..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-40351
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MACSIMIANO RIOS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:03-CR-250-2
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Macsimiano Rios (“Rios”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction
and sentence for aiding and abetting in the possession with
intent to distribute nine kilograms of cocaine. He argues that
21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) are unconstitutional in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466 (2000). Rios raises an
issue that he concedes is foreclosed but seeks to preserve for
further review.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-40351
-2-
This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States
v. Slaughter,
238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly,
Rios’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.