Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rios, 04-40351 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-40351 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 23, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40351 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MACSIMIANO RIOS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-250-2 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Macsimiano Rios (“Rios”) appeals his guilty
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 22, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 04-40351
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MACSIMIANO RIOS,
                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 2:03-CR-250-2
                      --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Macsimiano Rios (“Rios”) appeals his guilty-plea conviction

and sentence for aiding and abetting in the possession with

intent to distribute nine kilograms of cocaine.   He argues that

21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) are unconstitutional in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).   Rios raises an

issue that he concedes is foreclosed but seeks to preserve for

further review.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-40351
                               -2-

     This argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States

v. Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582 (5th Cir. 2000).   Accordingly,

Rios’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer