Zayler v. Snyder, 04-40695 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-40695
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 06, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 6, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 04-40695 _ In The Matter Of: KATHLEEN L SNYDER Debtor _ KATHLEEN L SNYDER Appellee v. STEPHEN J ZAYLER Appellant _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 6:03-CV-182-LED _ Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court re
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 6, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 04-40695 _ In The Matter Of: KATHLEEN L SNYDER Debtor _ KATHLEEN L SNYDER Appellee v. STEPHEN J ZAYLER Appellant _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 6:03-CV-182-LED _ Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court rev..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 6, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III ____________________ Clerk No. 04-40695 ____________________ In The Matter Of: KATHLEEN L SNYDER Debtor _________________________________________________________________ KATHLEEN L SNYDER Appellee v. STEPHEN J ZAYLER Appellant _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 6:03-CV-182-LED _________________________________________________________________ Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court reversing the Memorandum of Decision of the bankruptcy court entered February 18, 2003, is affirmed for essentially the reasons set out in the district court’s Memorandum and Order on Appeal entered April 27, 2004. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
