Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bautista, 04-40864 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-40864 Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40864 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUTH BAUTISTA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-332-1 - Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ruth Bautista pleaded guilty to one charge of po
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 20, 2005

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 04-40864
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

RUTH BAUTISTA,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:03-CR-332-1
                       --------------------

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Ruth Bautista pleaded guilty to one charge of possession of

more than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute and was

sentenced to serve 60 months in prison and a four-year term of

supervised release.    Bautista argues for the first time on appeal

that the statute of conviction, 21 U.S.C. ยง 841(a), (b), is

unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).   This argument is, as she concedes, foreclosed.        See

United States v. Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582 (5th Cir. 2000).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer