Spree v. United States, 04-40894 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 04-40894
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 28, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 28, 2005 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40894 Summary Calendar _ DELTON SPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CV-107 _ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 28, 2005 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40894 Summary Calendar _ DELTON SPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CV-107 _ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affir..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 28, 2005 _____________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-40894 Summary Calendar _____________________ DELTON SPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CV-107 __________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the judge in his order of May 11, 2004. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act limitations barred this action six months after the date of the Coast Guard’s denial letter on September 20, 2002, but no suit was filed until September 5, 2003. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
