Filed: Jun. 22, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41128 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR DELEON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-24-1 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Edgar Deleon has moved fo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41128 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR DELEON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-24-1 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed for Edgar Deleon has moved for..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-41128
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDGAR DELEON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CR-24-1
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed for Edgar Deleon has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Deleon has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.