Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rios, 04-41199 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-41199 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-41199 Conference Calendar SALVADOR RIOS, Plaintiff-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CV-102 - Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Salvador Rios, federal prisoner #08394-023, wrote a letter about conditions at the Brooks County Detentio
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  April 20, 2005

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                              No. 04-41199
                          Conference Calendar



SALVADOR RIOS,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellant.


                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                         USDC No. 2:04-CV-102
                         --------------------

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Salvador Rios, federal prisoner #08394-023, wrote a letter

about conditions at the Brooks County Detention Center on behalf

of himself and other inmates, which was treated as a complaint in

a civil rights action and dismissed without prejudice.        Rios

contends that federal officials subsequently mishandled his mail

and legal materials, thereby hindering his refiling of a proper

complaint.     Rios seeks a remand and an opportunity to file an

amended complaint.    However, he fails to identify any specific

defendant or violation of a constitutional right in connection

with the dismissed action.    He thus has identified no error in



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 04-41199
                               -2-

the district court’s dismissal.   See 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1).

     The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer