Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Debouse, 04-50593 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-50593 Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50593 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK DEBOUSE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:03-CR-163-ALL - Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Patrick Debouse appeals his conviction followin
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 20, 2005

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 04-50593
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK DEBOUSE,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7:03-CR-163-ALL
                       --------------------

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Patrick Debouse appeals his conviction following a jury

trial for being a felon in possession of a firearm.      Debouse

argues that the district court should have instructed the jury on

transitory possession.   Debouse argues that the jury instruction

he requested is supported by United States v. Panter, 
688 F.2d 268
, 269 (5th Cir. 1982).

     Panter is inapposite, however, because Debouse did not

possess a firearm in self-defense.    See 
id. at 272.
   Because the


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 04-50593
                                -2-

instruction Debouse requested incorrectly stated the law and was

without foundation in the evidence, the district court did not

abuse its discretion when it declined to use it.   See United

States v. Tannehill, 
49 F.3d 1049
, 1057-58 (5th Cir. 1995);

Panter, 688 F.2d at 269
.

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer