Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sauls, 04-50767 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-50767 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 14, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50767 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NACOMAS EUGENE SAULS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-14-ALL - Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 December 14, 2005

                                                             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk
                              No. 04-50767
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NACOMAS EUGENE SAULS,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. 7:04-CR-14-ALL
                          --------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Nacomas Eugene Sauls has

moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the brief, Sauls’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.       Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer