United States v. Estrada-Salas, 05-10050 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-10050
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 06, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit _ FILED No. 05-10050 April 5, 2005 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. JORGE ESTRADA-SALAS Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (04-CR-60) - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to vacate the sentence is g
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit _ FILED No. 05-10050 April 5, 2005 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. JORGE ESTRADA-SALAS Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (04-CR-60) - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to vacate the sentence is gr..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit _____________________ FILED No. 05-10050 April 5, 2005 _____________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. JORGE ESTRADA-SALAS Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (04-CR-60) --------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to vacate the sentence is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to remand the case for resentencing is granted. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
