Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mince, 05-10189 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-10189 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 18, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10189 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE DEAN MINCE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-8-ALL - Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Cas
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 17, 2005

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-10189
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESSE DEAN MINCE,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 1:04-CR-8-ALL
                      --------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesse Dean Mince

presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United

States v. Daugherty, 
264 F.3d 513
, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which

rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-

of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).     The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer